Scorching hot housing market giving additional buying power to sellers

– The average long-distance mover relocated to a ZIP code with home values nearly $27,000 lower than where they came from last year

– U.S. movers in 2020 relocated to ZIP codes with homes 33 square feet larger than where they came from, on average

– Fast-rising home values and new location options helped movers cash in and find more affordable locales

Americans who made out-of-town moves last year typically paid less money for larger houses, according to a new Zillow® analysis of moving data from northAmerican® Van Lines.

Zillow logo (PRNewsfoto/Zillow Group)

That’s a sharp break from the trend in recent years. The housing market’s impressive strength in 2020 paired with a newfound motivation to move helped sellers cash in on quickly rising home values to find places that better suit their needs — namely, bigger homes in less-expensive areas.

Movers went to ZIP codes where sold homes are 33 square feet larger on average than where they came from — roughly the size of a walk-in closet or extra bathroom. This was a significant jump from the 9-to 21-square foot step-up movers have taken in recent years.

“The ability to sell in a relatively expensive market and relocate somewhere more affordable — either to save money or get more bang for their buck with a larger property — was extremely attractive to movers,” said Jeff Tucker, senior economist at Zillow.

Zillow’s recent Mover Report found the top metros for net in-migration, with more people moving in than out, are sunny and relatively affordable. PhoenixCharlotte and Austin led the U.S. in terms of net in-migration.

Taken as a whole, the findings are evidence of the Great Reshuffling at work. Up until March 2020, workers were largely locked to locations within a bearable commute of their workplace. When the pandemic hit, many began working remotely — spending a lot more time at home and thinking about where, and how, they want to live. A larger house with an office or chef’s kitchen, or a home with lower monthly payments in sunny Arizona, became extremely alluring.

All the while, interest rates kept dropping, adding fuel to a scorching-hot housing market and boosting shoppers’ buying power. Home appreciation was supercharged in 2020 by massive demand and limited supply, driving typical home values up 8.4% ($20,716) over the course of 2020, compared with 3.7% growth ($8,791) in 2019.

Tucker said the trend could contribute to convergence in home prices, as people move away from the priciest cities and toward more affordable ones, which will tend to cause prices to rise in their destinations. It may also spread out some of the consumer spending, tax revenues and job growth that have been increasingly concentrated in “superstar cities” over the last few decades. Home values are rising fastest in places like Austin and Phoenix, and most slowly in San Francisco, which led the U.S. in appreciation as recently as 2016.

Nationwide, the average home value in ZIP codes people moved from was about $419,000, compared to an average home value in destination ZIP codes of about $392,000. This means the average mover was sliding down the price ladder by about $27,000. When movers relocated in 2019, average home values in their destinations were only about $3,400 less than where they started.

The trend in 2020 to move to more affordable places than in years past was seen across nearly every type of move between urban, suburban and rural areas. People leaving urban ZIP codes moved to areas that were $66,000 cheaper in 2020, versus an average of about $26,000 cheaper in the previous four years. Those leaving suburban ZIPs moved about $23,000 down the price ladder, compared to an average decrease of just over $500 the previous four years.

Even those leaving rural areas for urban or suburban areas, where prices are higher, only moved up the price ladder by about $31,000 this year as opposed to roughly $41,000 in recent years.

“We have felt the impact of this supercharged market since the second half of 2020.  These migration patterns are challenging the moving industry to provide capacity in the right places.  As you would expect, we end up with a lot of trucks in the low-cost areas where people are moving to, and fewer trucks in the high-cost areas where demand is high,” said Kevin Murphy, Vice President and General Manager of northAmerican Van Lines. “It is more important than ever to make sure you have a reliable partner helping you with your move.”

Migration to less urban areas picked up slightly in 2020 compared to 2019, while moves to more dense locations ticked down — which is not to say that early pandemic fears of an urban exodus have been borne out. The number of households that moved out of urban areas did not significantly rise in 2020. Beyond that, Zillow’s Urban-Suburban report found that despite some early pandemic-era narratives, suburban housing markets did not disproportionately strengthen in 2020 at the expense of urban areas.

The biggest decrease in share of moves between area classes was from suburban to urban, which fell 1.5% year over year. The largest increase was seen in suburban to rural moves, which increased by 1.2% on the year.

San Jose saw the most extreme changes in average home value for both those moving to and from ZIP codes within the metro, followed by San Francisco and Los Angeles. Those moving out of San Jose went to a ZIP with average home values nearly $1.2 million lower, while those moving in saw houses worth about $1.4 million more than where they came from.

Moving on Up – Americans’ Preferences for Larger Homes, 2016-2020

Load Year

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

Ave. SF Origin ZIP

1,840

1,862

1,858

1,856

1,880

Ave. SF Destination ZIP

1,856

1,871

1,878

1,878

1,913

Ave. SF Change, Origin to Destination ZIP

16

9

20

21

33

Metropolitan

  Area*

Zillow Home
Value Index
(ZHVI); April,
2021

ZHVI %
Change
Year over
Year;
April,
2021

Ave. ZHVI
Change for
those
Moving In

Ave. ZHVI
Change for
those Moving
Out

Ave. SF
Change
for those
Moving
In

Ave. SF
Change
for those
Moving
Out

United States

$281,370

11.6%

($26,963)

($26,963)

33

33

New York, NY

$530,082

9.5%

$144,774

($158,981)

83

71

Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA

$783,610

10.4%

$614,793

($591,517)

(113)

269

Chicago, IL

$270,352

9.5%

($85,080)

$89,775

(55)

135

Dallas-Fort Worth, TX

$289,582

11.9%

($61,326)

$28,762

468

(369)

Philadelphia, PA

$288,947

13.3%

($82,866)

$46,656

55

(27)

Houston, TX

$241,698

9.1%

($69,253)

$59,995

451

(449)

Washington, DC

$498,649

11.5%

$146,141

($135,203)

(71)

159

Miami-Fort Lauderdale, FL

$336,714

9.1%

($144,164)

$74,801

(264)

331

Atlanta, GA

$280,038

13.0%

($63,161)

$31,392

374

(293)

Boston, MA

$563,149

11.6%

$190,243

($170,429)

(60)

131

San Francisco, CA

$1,235,705

7.4%

$856,457

($815,525)

(129)

274

Detroit, MI

$209,728

11.0%

($107,479)

$119,830

(64)

112

Riverside, CA

$460,833

16.2%

$46,162

($92,823)

85

17

Phoenix, AZ

$355,822

20.4%

($48,237)

($27,012)

116

(55)

Seattle, WA

$627,290

14.6%

$260,754

($264,337)

(56)

105

Minneapolis-St Paul, MN

$331,152

9.9%

($76,075)

$75,690

79

(8)

San Diego, CA

$729,318

16.5%

$396,605

($422,781)

(235)

236

St. Louis, MO

$205,604

11.5%

($95,351)

$112,849

56

15

Tampa, FL

$271,353

15.8%

($79,814)

$73,756

(196)

253

Baltimore, MD

$332,992

11.2%

($28,097)

$64,057

(35)

153

Denver, CO

$517,395

12.9%

$66,326

($141,738)

273

(264)

Pittsburgh, PA

$185,063

13.0%

($143,326)

$138,316

(136)

205

Portland, OR

$482,708

13.3%

($68,322)

($9,567)

(42)

99

Charlotte, NC

$281,335

14.4%

($65,427)

$63,422

296

(220)

Sacramento, CA

$507,735

14.3%

$90,214

($128,023)

(77)

49

San Antonio, TX

$233,083

10.4%

($77,521)

$52,586

216

(228)

Orlando, FL

$285,049

8.3%

($89,488)

$64,618

(31)

78

Cincinnati, OH

$218,672

14.6%

($102,691)

$123,198

(53)

76

Cleveland, OH

$184,224

13.5%

($197,369)

$204,956

(183)

(31)

Kansas City, MO

$241,203

14.6%

($74,845)

$68,806

315

(291)

Las Vegas, NV

$330,880

9.4%

($112,481)

$18,096

(23)

41

Columbus, OH

$244,220

12.4%

($102,017)

$111,565

(90)

81

Indianapolis, IN

$212,334

13.7%

($96,710)

$124,727

565

(464)

San Jose, CA

$1,364,273

5.9%

$1,357,893

($1,160,458)

(74)

212

Austin, TX

$441,931

25.5%

($100,567)

$1,194

130

(100)

Virginia Beach, VA

$275,562

10.3%

($65,907)

$48,728

84

51

Nashville, TN

$320,818

11.0%

($50,689)

($9,082)

259

(261)

Providence, RI

$375,407

15.0%

($41,939)

$15,290

(63)

118

Milwaukee, WI

$232,744

13.9%

($116,431)

$128,666

(131)

154

Jacksonville, FL

$265,105

11.7%

($60,580)

$89,408

(24)

95

Memphis, TN

$182,194

13.2%

($46,734)

$96,938

428

(349)

Oklahoma City, OK

$175,922

8.9%

($187,063)

$140,522

(98)

101

Louisville-Jefferson County, KY

$205,647

10.6%

($85,923)

$82,197

(102)

117

Hartford, CT

$274,468

13.6%

($125,603)

$104,594

(92)

66

Richmond, VA

$279,336

10.5%

($69,034)

$36,317

212

(154)

New Orleans, LA

$231,224

9.1%

($128,363)

$77,837

(99)

153

Buffalo, NY

$202,040

14.1%

($140,212)

$125,141

(141)

107

Raleigh, NC

$327,048

12.3%

($69,436)

$51,024

370

(272)

Birmingham, AL

$195,643

10.7%

($46,066)

$71,670

116

(178)

Salt Lake City, UT

$466,768

18.3%

$9,323

($47,652)

(20)

34

 

*Table ordered by market size 

Methodology: For every move in the interstate moves dataset shared with Zillow, Zillow compared the ZHVI in the origin and destination ZIP codes on the month of the move’s load date, and computed the mean change by year. Only moves with valid origin and destination ZHVI computed this way were considered for the calculation of ZHVI change. For square footage, we computed the median square footage of each home sold in a ZIP code in the year of the move’s load date, and only included moves with both a valid origin and destination median square footage. The change in median square footage for each move was then aggregated up to an average change in house size. Moving data was based on SIRVA/North American Van Lines data for the first 11 months of 2020.

About Zillow Group
Zillow Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: Z and ZG) is reimagining real estate to make it easier to unlock life’s next chapter.

As the most-visited real estate website in the United States, Zillow® and its affiliates offer customers an on-demand experience for selling, buying, renting or financing with transparency and nearly seamless end-to-end service. Zillow Offers® buys and sells homes directly in dozens of markets across the country, allowing sellers control over their timeline. Zillow Home Loans™, our affiliate lender, provides our customers with an easy option to get pre-approved and secure financing for their next home purchase. Zillow recently launched Zillow Homes, Inc., a licensed brokerage entity, to streamline Zillow Offers transactions.

Zillow Group’s brands, affiliates and subsidiaries include Zillow®, Zillow Offers®, Zillow Premier Agent®, Zillow Home Loans™, Zillow Closing Services™, Zillow Homes, Inc., Trulia®, Out East®, StreetEasy® and HotPads®. Zillow Home Loans, LLC is an Equal Housing Lender, NMLS #10287 (www.nmlsconsumeraccess.org).

About North American Van Lines, Inc.
With over 300 agents throughout the U.S. and Canada, North American Van Lines, Inc., established in 1933, is a leader in providing specialized transit services and high quality, personalized household goods moving services to consumers, corporations, military personnel and governments. North American, based in Fort Wayne, IN, is a wholly-owned subsidiary of SIRVA Inc., a leader in providing relocation solutions to a well- established and diverse customer base around the world. Information on North American Van Lines (U.S. DOT No. 070851) can be found on the Internet at www.northamerican.com.

SOURCE Zillow

For further information: Mark Stayton, Zillow, press@zillow.com

SHARE THIS ARTICLE